Max Beverly
1/26/15
Dr. Kirsten Kaschock
ENGL 102
Identity paper
I grew up in Massachusetts, a primarily blue state. I enjoyed the privileges from the public school and the good health care system. Because of these benefits, I am a liberal. It’s easy to be liberal when you grow up in a state that is mostly democrats. I think that liberal is a relative term, depending on where you grow up. I wondered what would make others in other countries define themselves as liberal. I wanted to know what would make someone liberal in a place in the world that has different ideals and a different government. I have a friend who also grew up in my home town in Massachusetts, but she is going to a University in England. She has helped me better understand the difference in culture and politics from the United States and England. Liberals in England are similar in thought to liberals in the United States. There is a kind of universal thought that can define liberals in any culture. This attachment can be used to compare and contrast the two nations and their peoples. The nations differ because they come from vastly different backgrounds and histories.
When someone identifies himself/herself as a liberal, this person could be defining their political, social, or economic viewpoints. To which of these viewpoints the person is referring depends on how and where he/she grew up. “Liberal” is a relative term in many cases, however, there are some fundamental ideals that all liberals follow. However, these ideals are so general, most people understand them and follow them whether they are relatively liberal or not. The origins of liberalism are centered around “‘sustained rational examination of self, others and social practices.’” (Tate) In the free world, being able to judge yourself and others in a society is a right, so I will not be talking about liberalism this generally. In the United States, someone is likely to be considered liberal based on their social views of current controversial issues. However, in England, social topics are generally not debated as often as economic ones: “Most parties in the uk disagree on economic issues and policies, not social ones.” (Griesmer) The liberal spectrum in the United States doesn’t truly take economic viewpoints into consideration because there is not a large difference in economic views in the United States. This is similar to the fact that in England, social “topics aren’t controversial. They’re legal and not about to be banned anytime soon.” Not everywhere do people define themselves as liberal for the same reasons.
I identify myself as a liberal because of my ideals, however, one may find oneself in liberal culture by voicing your opinions more publicly. In the United States, people are voicing their opinions about controversial social views and some economic issues. For example, in the United States, there recently was the Occupy movement, whose slogan was “We are the 99%”. This meant that about how the top earning 1% of people in the United States share nearly 25% of wealth in the country. The rallies were to promote a higher minimum wage and greater taxes on the extremely wealthy. The people who are a part of this movement are considered liberal because of their economic views. In England, there are liberals who are also working to raise minimum wage and to get rid of tuition.” (Griesmer) In this way, liberals in the United States and in England share a common goal which is making level ground economically for those from any economic class.
If one regards liberalism in a relative way for each of the respective countries, one could say that the United States is becoming more liberal when England is becoming less liberal. Socially, the United States has accepted many new policies that are considered liberal, such as in issues like women’s rights, and equal marriage rights. Even in an economic standpoint, the United States has become more liberal with its new healthcare system. However, England could be considered to be becoming more conservative, because they’ve “hiked uni tuition in the past 10 years, [and] they’re privatizing their healthcare system to model it after the old one in the US.” (Griesmer) This is economically more conservative than before, because “up until 2001 I think, their university system used to be free.” (Griesmer) It seems that the United States and England may see the political gap between them grow in the future because of the divergent ways.
Whether we like it or not, your political values are affected by where you are from. I see myself as a liberal because of my social and economic views and how they relate to the rest of the country, I do not look on a worldwide scale to see how my views lineup. The cultural difference in the US and in England provide a difference in how people define themselves as a liberal.
Griesmer, Sadie. "American versus English Liberalism." Online interview. 26 Jan. 2015.
Griesmer answers my questions over facebook. I ask her 10 questions on what liberalism is like in England and how it differs from American liberalism. I was able to get a very good idea of how one is determined to be a liberal in England and she points out my predisposition to what liberalism truly is. She states how the culture between liberals in England and in the United States is not completely comparable, but the similarities and differences are seen.
Hatcher, Richard. "The Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition Government's "free Schools" in England." Educational Review (2011): n.pag. ProQuest. Web.
This article speaks on the benefit and downsides of free schools in England. It explains the economic, social and political impacts of allowing free schools in england. It also compares schools in England to schools in the United States and Sweden. I find this to be a useful article because I think that education is a very important political policy and I think it reflects a countries liberalism. The US has a public school system that is free from ages 5 to 18. This is similar in England, however, students pay drastically less in tuition and fees to go to university in England than in the US.
Pestritto, Ronald J. "Founding Liberalism, Progressive Liberalism, And The Rights Of Property." Social Philosophy and Policy 28.02 (2011): n. pag. ProQuest. Web.
This piece looks in detail at the change of liberalism in the United States. I found that a background of the change to modern liberalism in the US was helpful to see a difference in the politics of England and in the US. The piece speaks specifically to traditional liberal topics such as property ownership and freedom. While the piece does talk about an older era, it still provides insight to the fundamentals of liberalism and what it means to the United States.
Tate, John William. "‘We Cannot Give One Millimetre'? Liberalism, Enlightenment and Diversity." Political Studies 61.4 (2013): n.pag. ProQuest. Web.
This final piece speaks to the philosophical views behind liberalism. These views are worldwide, as they are made by famous philosophers. The statements made in this piece link the views of these great philosophers and liberalism as a whole, including the freedom of the human soul, and a human's right to property. It will be useful to me because it will provide insight to a worldwide view of liberalism, and I can see the United States' and England's differing view on this philosophy.